twitter Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Email RSS

Monday Book News: 6 Links For Your Morning Coffee Break

Death Cloud, by Andrew Lane

Death Cloud, by Andrew Lane

Good morning, book people! It’s daylight savings in Massachusetts now – and this is the second day we’ve slept in! Of course, it can’t all be blamed on daylight savings–there were several hours’ worth of screaming toddler, too. And now for something completely different…

Author Maureen Johnson ran a hugely successful campaign–over $14,000 worth of successful–to raise money for disaster relief in Japan this weekend. Although her campaign is now closed, you can still donate to Shelterbox. Never heard of Shelterbox? Here’s why they’re awesome:

We respond instantly to natural and manmade disasters by delivering boxes of aid to those who are most in need. Each box supplies an extended family of up to 10 people with a tent and essential equipment to use while they are displaced or homeless.

In January The Hunger Games movie was given a release date–and now it may have its lead actress. Variety is reporting that Lionsgate is close to reaching a deal with blonde-haired, blue-eyed, fair-skinned actress Jennifer Lawrence. I’ve written about why The Hunger Games needs an actress who’s closer to Katniss in terms of physical description in the past–and I stand by that now. Lawrence may be a skilled actress, but casting someone who’s clearly not “olive-skinned” to play Katniss is a Big Deal. Why? From my original piece (at PopMatters):

Although physical description is, generally speaking, a less-significant detail, Katniss’ status as a non-white heroine is important because she’s that rare commodity: a big time, mainstream non-white heroine.

Over at the Blue Rose Girls, a bit of fun - pictures from a children’s book bar! The murals are by Ludwig Bemelmans, the original illustrator for the Madeline books. I love Madeline – and the pics are definitely worth a look.

At The Guardian, David Barnett fills us in on the latest genre wars – as in last year’s Franzenfreude, the fracas is all about marginalization. Author Stephen Hunt is accusing the BBC of bias against his genre, science fiction. He’s taken his crusade one step further, though, and has launched a petition for one genre “to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.” Do you think SF (and its counterpart, F) are marginalized?

Graham Moore at The NYT has a review of Death Cloud, Andrew Lane’s attempt “to update and adapt Sherlock Holmes for a new generation, much the way Guy Ritchie has done with a swashbuckling Sherlock on screen.” The book follows 14 year old Sherlock, and sounds like a fun read. (I’ve read the entire Holmes series several times over, and will definitely be picking this up.)

And finally, at The WSJ, Helen Schulman writes about the process of constructing a novel: Write. Rewrite. Obsess. Repeat. Go read it now, especially if you’ve ever tottered at the edge of the Great and Terrible Abyss of Writerly Indecision.

And that’s all for now! I’ll be back later with the next installment of Cover Notes.

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Belle & Sebastian’s ‘Storytelling’ Is The Ultimate Sit Down & Write Song

The first time I heard Belle & Sebastian’s Storytelling, I stopped dead in the middle of a run. From the very first line of the very first verse, I was sucked in; the lyrics are so, so spot on it was like the duo were actually talking to me. The song is part of a soundtrack for Todd Solondz’ film of the same name where “college and high school serve as the backdrop for two stories about dysfunction and personal turmoil.” I still haven’t seen the movie, but it’s on my (extensive) TBW list.

Picture a scene in your mind
Look at all the people and take note of the setting behind
Listen, watch, and wait
A plot begins to take shape
There’s a story
And then characters will come to you
Relating events as they choose to
But all their words and actions come entirely from you…

Pay particular attention to the last verse. It’s a perfect end note.

Have you seen Storytelling? What did you think? Does this song reflect how you write?

I’ll be back later with a post on Goodreads and the new Scholastic social network, You Are What You Read .

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

I Love Outlines, But I Can’t Write Them For Peanuts

Brightly colored frosting makes the best finger paint! It's tasty, too!

Brightly colored frosting makes the best finger paint! It's tasty, too!

One of the things non-fiction is good for is cultivating voice. Because NF has no characters to hide behind, it forces us to write as ourselves in a way regular fiction (as opposed to fictive or inspired-by memoir) doesn’t.

The voice I’ve spent so long honing in my NF work has helped me a lot over recent months–it’s easier for me to get into a character’s head without mapping or noting or any of the other techniques I used to use. But the other NF stalwart I’ve come to depend on, the outline, doesn’t carry over to fiction.

Granted, I rarely outline my blog posts (though I do use a blog client rather than writing directly in WordPress. More on that in another post.). But other than these posts, I stick to my non-fiction outlines the way finger paint sticks to my jeans, shirts, walls, and kitchen cupboards. Writing an article without an outline is difficult for me–I end up scattered and utterly confused. When I write fiction, though, I find the very act of writing an outline leaves me scattered!

Here’s what my non-fiction outlines tend to look like:

Title: Blog Post on Outlines, Plot, Voice

Intro

  • What am I writing about?
  • Key point – using outlines, getting confused, thoughts
  • Do outlines hinder voice or help it?
  • Relevant links: x, y, z

Where Am I Going With This? 2 Paragraphs

  • Point 1
  • expand, include a relevant quote
  • sum up

Conclusion

  • What I’ve learned/am thinking about
  • Questions

Extra funny thing: I can write from someone else’s outline with no hassle. Hand me a writing exercise, or hash something out with me for a short story, and I’m fine. Ask me to write the outline myself, and I’m a mess.Remember when I said non-fiction helps with voice, because there are no characters to hide behind? I think that’s my problem. Outlines in fiction–for me, anyway–take the story in an NF direction, so that I end up thinking news-and-opinion rather than character-and-plot-development.

Overall, not writing outlines isn’t a killer for me, but it is sometimes annoying. My writing group has no problem working out plots and sequencing, while I struggle to get all my ducks in a row. Oftentimes, this means I have to write and rewrite large chunks of a manuscript until it’s all internally consistent–which is a pain and a half! Lately, I’m getting over the hassle of this by keeping a soap opera diary.

A soap opera diary (I have no idea what they’re actually called, but that’s what a guy I used to know, who worked on Passions, called them) is like an encyclopedia for any given show. Continuity people keep track of all the births, deaths, marriages, evil takeovers, one night stands, coffee hijinks and more so that the show doesn’t contradict itself. There are still gaffes every now and then, but for the most part, the writers and continuity folk manage to keep the show fairly consistent. So, for my latest manuscript, I’ve started doing post-outlines, summarizing chapters and highlighting anything that could be a Big Continuity Issue later.

Do you write outlines for fiction, non-fiction, or both? How do you keep track of continuity issues?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Reading Kidlit: In Defense of Animal Fiction, part I

The Complete Tales of Beatrix PotterAnimal stories are everywhere. Many classic tales are animal stories, from Aesop’s Fables through Charlotte’s Web. Yet there’s an idea in kids’ publishing, out there on blogs, in classes and speeches, that animal fiction is no longer marketable, and has gone the way of the cute little bunnies in Watership Down.

Despite the naysaying, though, animal stories continue to show up in bookstores–Erin Hunter’s Seekers and Warriors, Kathy Appelt’s The Underneath, and Brian Jacques’ latest Insert-Redwall-Clone-Title-Here are jockeying for shelf space alongside more so-called middle grade popular fiction. So what is it about animal fiction that sets industry folk on edge?

The Beatrix Potter Complex

Many classic animal tales, particularly Victorian stories, follow what I think of as the Beatrix Potter/Peter Rabbit paradigm: they blend the cuteness of anthropomorphic animals (usually woodland creatures) with starker realities, as if the fact that Peter wears a smart robin’s egg waistcoat makes it more palatable for his father to have ended up in Mr. McGregor’s stew pot. In the original Redwall , the war-like tendencies of the sparrows (sparra), the snake, Asmodeus, eating characters, and the concepts each represent are balanced by the fuzzy-wuzziness of the mice, badgers, et. al and their Arthurian style honor code.

In some cases, anthropomorphic animals serve a particular purpose. Jane Yolen’s picture book series How Do Dinosaurs Say Goodnight/Go to the Dentist/Go to School/&c? (illustrated by Mark Teague) puts dinosaurs in place of children, giving parents and children a way to discuss everyday activities and rules and express frustration. They also play to a child’s desire to be like a favorite character–Let’s brush our teeth like Stegosaurus!–in a way a book about another “every kid” may not.

Other times, animal characters acting like people provide more fun, accessible illustrations and stories. This isn’t to say stories have to have animal characters to be fun and relatable, but animal characters can certainly add an appreciable layer to an already strong story. In Edel Rodriguez’ Sergio Saves The Game, Sergio, a penguin, dreams of becoming a soccer star, but is woefully inept on the field. Taking on the keeper’s role, he works through his frustrations and practices until he ultimately saves the day, keeping the big bad seagulls from scoring a critical goal. Another penguin story, Tacky the Penguin (Helen Lester, illustrated by Lynn Munsinger), follows the aptly named Hawaiian-shirted Tacky, who is disliked by the other penguins for his loud habits and garish dress sense. But when hunters come, it’s Tacky who scares them off, and the other, stuffier penguins come to recognize the value of being an individual, and appreciating each other quirks and all.

In a similar vein to Yolen’s Dinosaur series, the animal character helps set up a distance between the reader’s life and the protagonist’s life. This sort of distance can be very important in issues books–it allows kids and parents to read and discuss problems, like belonging and bullying, without the frustration, or setting up possible feelings of inadequacy and the like.

Sometimes, though, the Beatrix Potter Complex goes a little far–animals in people clothing, eating people food, and acting cutesy merely for the sake of cuteness can be a warning sign of other problems in a manuscript, picture book and middle grade alike. In a long lost piece by a kids’ editor, the described a particularly frightening anthropomorphic chicken manuscript she’d received, handwritten on hot pink paper. The story? A little fried chicken drumstick is lonely and only wants to be eaten and loved, eventually finding home and happiness at a local KFC. Peculiar, slightly morbid stories aside, though, there are other, more tangible–and fixable–problems in many animal stories, such as:

  • Cuteness carrying the story
  • Two dimensional characters/stereotypical characters–fat, hoarding pigs, empty-headed sheep etc.
  • No real story, merely walking through a jungle/farm/zoo setting or characters comparing notes
  • Characters with no flaws/relatability
  • Characters are too adult
  • Stories are preachy or moralizing

Animals With Human Traits? Or Humans With Animal Traits?

As anyone who’s ever picked up a mythology book knows, history is rife with stories of half-animal, half-human creatures, from centaurs and minotaurs through Anansi, the West African/Carribean spider-god. In these stories, the lines are often blurred between animal and human characteristics, and the characters are usually imperfect or have a not-quite-fatal flaw. Stories are rarely cute, yet rarely moral in a religious or morality play style way. Interestingly–perhaps because of the sense of “other” or “not-like-me”–animal/human characters are often deeper, and more fascinating, than a reader might expect. Unlike other animal related stories, these books are not relegated to the picture book and middle grade set; most are YA or adult lit.

Examples of Human/Animal/Mythical characters in fiction

  • Anansi in Neil Gaiman’s Anansi Boys
  • Coyote & Raven in Charles DeLint’s Newford series
  • Mermaids in Kathryn Lasky’s Hannah: Daughters of the Sea

Do you write animal fiction? Do you read animal stories? Or do you find them irritating? Can you think of any good examples?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Writing YA: Advice from literary agent Jennifer DeChiara on Twitter

Last week, agent Jennifer DeChiara opened the virtual floor to writers, taking questions on Twitter about everything from her flossing habits (once a year, like clockwork) to agent nudging. She represents a variety of genres, including kidlit and YA. Missed the conversation? Get the highlights below, and follow Jennifer on Twitter @4writers, and check out the Jennifer DeChiara Literary Agency online for resources and more.

Thanks to the Twitterverse for such great questions!

The Jennifer DeChiara Literary Agency is a New York City-based full-service literary agency founded in 2001 and named one of the top 25 literary agencies in the country by Writer’s Digest.

The agency represents children’s literature for all ages – picture books and middle-grade and young adult novels – but also represents high-quality adult fiction and non-fiction in a wide range of genres. The categories we are most enthusiastic about agenting are literary and commercial fiction; mysteries, thrillers, celebrity biographies; humor; psychology and self-help; parenting; health and fitness; women’s issues; men’s issues; pop culture; film and television; social issues and contemporary affairs.

JDLA is proud to be one of the few literary agencies to represent illustrators, as well as screenwriters for both television and film, including Emmy-winning writers and a Peabody Award-winning illustrator.

Note: I’ve reformatted some of the text into regular English for readers not used to Tweet/733+ speak.

Responses, Rejections, & Agent Nudging

Is no response from an agent always a no? Should I re-query?

I respond to all queries, unless they’re not sent to me by name (Dear Agent) or no name at; no response just means I never saw it.

Yes, I would [re-query], but make sure that you’re querying the way that particular agent requested (email, snail mail, smoke signal).

How many submissions do you see a month? Have you taken on many new clients this year?

About 20,000 each month; I honestly couldn’t tell you how many new clients I’ve taken on this past year – at least six, I’d say.

Please remember that I get so many projects thrown at me that I can only choose the ones I’m the most passionate about.

Is it okay to status query? I’ve read agents don’t like it.

Hard to answer in 140 characters! Check agent’s policies. I don’t mind being nudged, but not 2 wks after submitting something.

If an agent takes a long time to respond, does it mean they’re just not that into me? If it does, I’d rather just get a “no”.

Of course; but don’t assume that no response means no, especially if you email a query. They might not have even seen it.

Honestly, agents are so busy that 3 months is like 3 days; I have a business to run, clients to take care of, before reading new mss.

Should I avoid querying during the summer? Are agents still reading then?

Not at all; agents and editors still work during the summer, although things might move more slowly.

Do you read your own slush? Or do you have interns?

We used to have an entire room filled with boxes of slush and submissions. Now we only accept email queries it’s better, I guess, but it’s still overwhelming. We receive hundreds of e-queries each day, not to mention requested work, clients’ mss, etc.. I’ve tried it by having assistants read for me, but it never works. I prefer to read everything myself, which is why it takes me so long.

Writing, Voice, & Genre

Is it okay to say a book is multiple genres in a query?

That’s a red flag to me: if there are too many, it’s usually a sign that the ms needs to be reworked and refocused.

Is chick-lit outdated? Is there still a market for it?

Yes, it’s [the term] outdated, but I admit I still use it. :-)

Names might change, but women’s commercial fiction will stay the same. Substance might change slightly to reflect economy. Some say that women talking about their designer duds might not have an audience these days, but I think people need an escape, especially now.

Lots of agents and editors advise against prologues, but a lot of best-sellers and classics have them. Do you love them or hate them?

Some writers use them as a crutch, to give the reader information that they don’t know how to incorporate in their book. In my experience, I’ve found them to be unnecessary; I prefer jumping directly into the action anyway.

Agents and editors are always talking about voice. How can I develop my voice?

Every writer has his own beautiful voice, although it may need some finetuning. But most lose it by trying to be something they’re not, trying to copy other writers, not having confidence that they are unique and wonderful in their own right.

Market, Promotion, & What Agents Are Looking For

Are you interested in authors who write more than one genre/age range? Would you prefer an author who sticks with just one genre for a while?

Doesn’t really matter to me.

But when [the] 1st book gets published, the next few books should be in that genre; fans will be looking for more, writer needs to be established.

Is it okay to pitch a series?

[It’s] sort of a no-no; [the] first book must have numbers to do a series. Agents can envision a series from a grocery list; you don’t have to tell us.

Is it easier to get an agent if you already have a novel out?

Not necessarily, if the sales aren’t great. A debut novelist has more of a chance because of this, in my opinion.

What’s the best way to use social networking to promote your book?

Too much to say in 140 characters! Tons of books on the subject. Befriend many, offer help, don’t just try to sell your book.

Is it more important to write a story you love, or one the market loves?

Keep an eye on the market, but write what you’re passionate about, write from your heart. That’s where your best work will come from, IMO.

Advice For Writers

If there were one thing you could tell writers, something not up on blogs and other websites all the time, what would it be?

Believe in your talent and never give up. Don’t listen to naysayers. Take advice, digest it, but do what you think is best. Even if you never get published, no one can take away your joy in writing, which is why you should be doing it anyway.

Thanks to all the Twitter folk who posted such great questions!

@YolaRamunno @Crzywritergrl @jlhuspek @franklyj @JenSwanBooks @andieryan @theocgirl1 @thxthatwasfun @AshElizabeth01 @sarahjclark

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Writing: If E-books Become the Norm, Will We Need E-Agents?

The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making, Catherynne M Valente E-books have and e-rights have been hot topics this year, and with good reason. There’s been Google settlement news, iBooks and iPad news, distribution news, and now Borders is taking orders for a new e-reader. Although e-books are still far from the norm, they’re making a strong showing, and could soon be a proper marketing niche in their own right.

Where Do E-books Come From?

As it stands, anyone can publish an e-book. Write your text, save it as a PDF, upload it to a website, and you’re a self-pubbed e-book author. Though few fiction writers choose to go this route, it’s fairly routine for non fiction writers, with e-books about marketing, SEO, web 2.0, even how to write your novel and get it published popping up all over the interwebs.

Although not a large segment of the market, e-publishers also exist. These are the folk responsible for most e-pubbed fiction (find a list of e-publishers here and here). Because of their low overhead, there’s a lot of diversity in e-publishing–arguably more than in print–and you can find an e-house for pretty much anything, from picture books through serious non-fiction and memoir.

But e-books And e-books have a lot of growth potential. In a piece in The Telegraph, president of Sony’s digital reading division said, “Within five years there will be more digital content sold than physical content. Three years ago, I said within ten years but I realised that was wrong – it’s within five.”

Are E-Agents Necessary? Will They Be?

As it stands, I don’t think agents specializing in electronic rights and publishing are necessary. But things could change. More and more mainstream authors are experimenting with e-books, with science fiction and fantasy writers leading the charge. Catherynne M. Valente, an award-winning author, recently won the Andre Norton Award for Young Adult Science Fiction and Fantasy (a major award from the SFWA) for her electronically self published novel The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making. Cory Doctorow has offered several of his YA novels as free e-books (find his latest, For the Win, here), and the Baen Free Library has many free titles from authors including David Weber, Lois Bujold, Andre Norton, and Sarah Hoyt. (Learn more about the reasoning behind the library here.) Many, if not all of these books, are or will be available in print.

Why is this even a question if all these books are available in print? Because they weren’t all available in print–not from the get-go, anyway. Valente’s novel, Fairyland, began life as a self-published, donation-appreciated e-book (learn more here). An offer from a print publisher (Macmillan imprint Feiwel and Friends) didn’t come in until the serialized e-novel had neared completion.

Although Valente’s case is not the norm, it could be the harbinger of change in the publishing industry, particularly in the YA and science fiction/fantasy market. These are the readers most comfortable with technology, and willing to move with the times, the folk who made iPods so ubiquitous that while out running yesterday, I passed a 90 year old woman rocking out, iconic white earbuds plugged into her ears. Don’t get me wrong–I love print books. I love turning pages, and holding the weight of a hardcover between my palms. But e-books offer many opportunities, not the least of which is increased revenue for authors and publishers, especially if the much discussed agency model/iPad-iBooks talk grows into something real.

And then there’s Jack Konrath, the midlist author of the Jack Daniels police procedurals, made small waves when he cut ties with his print publisher, Hyperion, earlier this year.

As PW points out, Konrath isn’t an award-winning, top-level author, and his sales, showed neither decline nor uptick prior to the break. PW also notes that his most recent work–and first e-pubbed novel–was roundly rejected by publishing houses.

Still not convinced? Scott Waxman, at Waxman Literary, is also hopping on the e-book bandwagon. His new venture, Diversion Books (separate to the agency) offers authors another, middle-of-the-road option, “somewhere in between the big houses and the lonely road of self-publishing.” From PW:

Waxman said Diversion Books will take on authors who cannot sell books in numbers that make financial sense for the major houses. “If you have an author with a platform who can sell books, we’re happy selling 5,000 to 10,000 copies,” he said. While Diversion isn’t paying advances, it’s not taking everyone who comes in with a manuscript. “This isn’t self-publishing,” he went on. “[With us] you get real publishing support. I know you don’t get that with self-publishing. This lives in between.”

What Would An E-Agent Do?

To me, agents are a lot like lawyers. They’re a specialized position, rather than a one-reader-fits-all kind of job. E-agents would probably be much like regular agents in the same way divorce lawyers are similar to electronic rights lawyers–they’d have a particular interest in things relating to their clients, and maybe some (virutal?) on the job experience at an e-publisher. A few more things an e-agent might know about, or do:

  • represent authors in negotiations with e-publishers, or the e-division of a primarily print house
  • be familiar with contract law pertaining to electronic rights and web media, particularly grey areas such as distribution and foreign rights
  • understand copyright law, and how it affects e-books that are partials of a later, larger print book
  • understand the ins and outs of digital rights management (DRM), and actively advocate for the author
  • be able to distinguish between electronic formats, browsers, and readers
  • have contacts within the e-book industry
  • be open-minded–technology moves as fast as dandelion seeds in a strong nor’easter, so being able to think on the spot and move with the groove is particularly important

Would you publish an e-book? Would the house–say an e-imprint of the big six vs. A small time e-only press–make a difference? Would you prefer to have an agent for electronic publications? Or would you be happy to handle them yourself?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Are You a Hand-Writer or a Type-Lover?

Every day, we put words on a page. Some of us use pen or pencil. Some of us tap away at keyboards. Most of us do both, handwriting grocery lists, personal notes, even plot outlines, later typing emails, memos, and whole scenes. Some folks lean more toward the paper route, while others tap away on smart phone keyboards instead of grabbing the nearest pencil stub. Either way, we’re inputting words and data, right? Maybe.

Some time ago, I was at a Neal Stephenson talk hosted by the Harvard Bookstore (and held in the First Parish Church in Cambridge, a strangely appropriate venue given he was signing Anathem. During the question session, someone asked Stephenson–a science fiction writer and well-known tech aficionado–

“If you could only teach your kids one or the other, which would you teach? Handwriting or typing?”

Stephenson’s answer was fairly hedged, as if he wanted to say “just typing” but couldn’t bring himself to dismiss handwriting as a fast-disappearing, unnecessary skill. In the end, though, he settled on handwriting because you can always write with a pencil, or a stick, and pay someone else to type it up. And Stephenson has written several of his works the long way–

“The manuscript of The Baroque Cycle was written by hand on 100% cotton paper using three different fountain pens: a Waterman Gentleman, a Rotring, and a Jorg Hysek.”

Back in April (why does that seem so long ago?) I saw Cory Doctorow, another SF (well, sort of) writer with tech roots, and founder of Boing Boing at the Harvard Coop. Giving props to the anonymous guy I’d seen at the Neal Stephenson do, I asked Doctorow the same thing. His reply? “I only have one kid, and I’d teach her to type. Definitely type.” Why? Because his handwriting is so poor! When Doctorow signs copies of his books, he scrawls “Stay Free” beneath the reader’s name. But Doctorow’s “Stay Free” looks a lot more like “stay frog” or “stay froo” (I’ll add a picture from my copy when I get back from sunny-yet-surprisingly-cold Tucson). Doctorow also types pretty much everything.

But not all SF writers and tech-loving folk are so type-set. Neil Gaiman starts out scribbling almost everything by hand then typing it up later. While this may seem old-school, Gaiman is certainly not resistant to technology–he’s an active blogger and tweeter who just happens to be in love with well-made pens and papers.

J.K Rowling, on the other hand, writes almost exclusively by hand, and even sold her original handwritten copy of The Tales of Beedle the Bard to raise money for charity. Rowling, however, is very anti-tech, and determined that none of
her books will ever appear in e-book form.

Kristin Cashore, author of Graceling, Fire, and the upcoming Bitterblue, takes the longhand process a step further–or further back–creating detailed handwritten story journals before setting out on a first draft. Drafts are then written longhand and slowly dictated into her mac every few days, “because I’m afraid the house will burn down and I’ll lose everything.” Cashore even has a fireproof and waterproof safe for protecting her work.

And me? I type most of the time, though I find putting pen to paper gets me through the rough patches, and helps me keep track of random bits of dialogue. But for me, handwriting is also hand-drawing–most of my notebooks are filled with doodles and sometimes relevant scribbles that wind around the text. The scribbles eventually grow into coherent words, though sometimes not until I’ve storyboarded or sketched out a whole scene, complete with stick figure characters and room detail. Why? Drawing–albeit poor drawing–is my way of articulating ideas I can’t quite get my head around on the first go.

Do you type or handwrite? What do you like about your way?

Later this week–pros and cons for handwriting and typing, and why they’re important.

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Reading Kid Lit: Are We Stripping Away Necessary Realities?

Sitting, by trublueboyIn some ways, being a kid is like living in a hamster ball: you’re seen but not heard see more than everyone else realizes; and when things get prickly, it’s pretty easy to roll the ball into a more convenient locale ‘til everything’s sorted. Recent years have shown a surge in edgy, almost razor sharp issue-tackling YA, with books running the gamut from teen-mother-abandons-new-baby (Amy Efaw’s After) to drug use and suicide (John Green’s Looking For Alaska). But kid lit–what many readers define as middle grade novels and below–remains, in large part, blunted by our desire to protect children.

Protecting children isn’t bad–keeping our kids safe is a Very, Very Good Thing, and I am constantly at war with my conflicting desires to let Baby learn about the world/wrap him up in the thickest swathes of cotton wool I can find. In the past, I’ve written about limits in YA literature, and I’m certainly not a fan of gratuitous violence in any medium. And yet, as Christopher Beam’s article about child suicide on Slate reminded me, my attitude toward violence does not negate the act itself–violence, and suicide, exist. But do they exist in kid literature?

Children & Suicide: Causes & Statistics

According to the Slate piece (which pulls most of its numbers from the CDC), approximately four out of every 500,000 children under the age of twelve commits suicide. A few more figures:

  • 4 out of every 500,000 children below the age of 12 commit suicide per year
  • The child suicide rate has doubled since 1979
  • Suicide is the 14th leading cause of death for kids under 12, coming in after meningitis and anemia

As Beam points out, working out what’s a suicide and what’s not for this age group is difficult:

Child suicides aren’t like teen or adult suicides, which usually start with an idea, proceed with a plan, and end with action. Suicide among children is more likely to be spontaneous and less connected to psychiatric disorder or aggression. This is often reflected in the method: Instead of hanging or cutting or using a gun, “suicidal” kids tend to kill themselves by doing things their parents have warned them against, such as running into traffic or jumping out of a window.

As a result, it’s often hard to tell the difference between a suicide and an accident. (Official definition of suicide: “Fatal self-inflicted destructive act with explicit or inferred intent to die.”) For example, a medical examiner might be presented with the case of an autistic child who jumped off his bunk bed in a hospital, hit his head on the floor, and died. Or a little girl might jump out the window in the course of a fight with her older brother.

There are a variety of factors that contribute to child suicide, and while some of them may be familiar as teen and adult risk factors, impulsivity is a key issue.

Factors Contributing to Child Suicide

  • Depression
  • Impulsiveness
  • Mood disorders/ADHD
  • Conduct disorder/antisocial behavior
  • Environment–e.g. living in an abusive household/getting expelled
  • Outside factors–e.g. Death of a loved one

The factors that cause children to commit suicide differ slightly from their older counterparts. Depression can play a role, but among the youngest suicides, a predisposition to impulsiveness is just as important. Children who kill themselves often have a mood disorder, ADHD, or a “conduct disorder,” which basically means antisocial behavior. Living an in abusive household can lay the groundwork for suicidal behavior, and an incident like getting kicked out of school or a dying relative can trigger it.

Depression, Violence, & Suicide in Kid Lit

If you search for kids’ books about suicide, most of the titles you’ll find are about coping after a loss. Some YA books that deal with depression and suicide, like Stephen Chbosky’s The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Ned Vizzini’s It’s Kind of a Funny Story, Julie Anne Peters’ By The Time You Read This, I’ll Be Dead, and Michael Thomas Ford’s Suicide Notes may appeal to younger readers. So far, though, I’ve yet to find a book with a middle grade protagonist dealing with depression and thoughts of suicide (if you can think of any, let me know–I’m working on getting a list together).

“Gratuitous violence” is a term familiar to parents everywhere. In our efforts to protect children, we slap ratings on videogames and movies, and there’s been talk of instituting a rating system for books. A few times a year, the issue comes up on a popular TV show, or is the subject of a big time newspaper article. Although violence isn’t the issue here, our attitude toward gratuitous violence and kid media is symptomatic of our attitudes toward other difficult topics and children–keep the bad stuff locked up tight, or hide it under the bed with the monsters.

Does this mean we should start inundating our kids with books about violent homes and six year old who hang themselves with belts? No. But books with middle grade protagonists addressing depression and the other contributing factors listed above could be worth adding to the family library.

Edgy YA may seem like an escape, or as Gail Giles put it in a 2003 presentation at an Assembly on Literature for Adolescents (ALAN), edgy YA is a way for–

the reader to live their darkness in fiction, to get the rage out, and to suffer the consequences on the page. The reader can work through natural teen confusion, despair, rage, and pain, but allow the character to walk in the dark woods, let the character commit the violence, and let the reader suffer the character’s consequences vicariously.

But for some readers, edgy material goes even deeper than that–it’s a way of recognizing problems, parsing feelings, and realizing that they are not alone. Edgy books give readers a structure within which they can start to deal, or show them how to set up their own scaffolding. These books, however, are largely reserved for older readers, sticking the middle grade set with books that fit the PG rating.

Should there books about suicide, depression, and violence specifically for middle grade readers? Yes. If there are kids out there experiencing these things, then yes, we should write books for them. No, such books won’t be for every reader, and I’m not even sure if they should be shelved in the regular middle grade section of the bookstore, but they should exist. They need to exist. Fortunately, some already do–but they’re not enough.

Serious Middle Grade Books

There are serious MG titles out there. The Buffalo Tree by Adam Rapp, is about a 13 year old in a juvenile detention center; Deborah Ellis’ non-fiction book, Three Wishes, is a collection of interviews with children 8 – 18 in Israel and Palestine; Sherman Alexie’s Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian navigates issues of belonging, self-worth, circumstances, and race; the list goes on and on. (I’m compiling a list right now; if you can think of any titles that should be on it, I’d love to hear from you.)

I’m Just A Writer–What Can I Do About It?

Not every children’s book needs to have a message–tucked away or up front. Reading books that make us think is rewarding in many ways, but reading books for the sheer pleasure of the story (and yes, I do think there are some books that do both–To Kill A Mockingbird comes to mind) is rewarding, too. And while rushing to the computer to bang out a few chapters about depression and suicide and rework the themes in your work in progress is a noble idea, it’ll probably just wreak havoc with your story. So what can you do?

Get serious. Take kids–not just teens–seriously. If you’re writing a serious story, write a serious story. Don’t gloss over the big issues, couch them in overly sophisticated language, or worse, use a little writerly hand-waving as an excuse to leave them out altogether.

Listen. Don’t assume you know what your kids/friends’ kids/readers are saying or thinking. Take the time to listen to their words, and how they express themselves.

Be honest. There’s a reason the old adage, “honesty is the best policy” has become, well, an adage. Kids, like teens, have a built in crap-o-meter. If you load them up with the brown stuff, they’ll know, and you’ll lose not just credibility, but the chance to tell a worthwhile story to someone who needs it.

Do you know of any middle-grade novels related to depression and suicide? Can you think of any titles for my upcoming serious middle grade list?

Image Credit: Sitting, by Trublueboy

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

The Case For Writing Poorly, Or Using Straightforward Prose

Writing is a numbers game–the more books you sell, the more money you make. If you write fast, it’s even better. Getting a book out every year for ten years (Jasper Fforde’s goal), if you sell enough, could be quite lucrative (and your hourly rate might actually approach positive numbers). Yet writing, good writing, takes time to craft. Story, characters, and prose itself do not happen overnight, particularly if you’re fond of tight dialogue and polished writing. But here’s the secret: not all readers are writers, and a lot of them don’t care about your perfectly polished prose.

Poor writing–a term I hear bandied about once or twice a year, whenever I’m in a group of writers–is not simply writing badly. It’s the perception of writing badly, of writing in a way that focuses less on literature and writing, and more on reading.

Don’t get me wrong–metaphor, allegory, and description are three of my closest friends. Whenever I read a passage I truly love, I add it to my Quotes & Adorations file, saving (and savoring) it for a time when I need a little literary love. But pop fiction, from chick lit to cozy mysteries, is popular for a reason: it’s easy to read, easy to digest, and easy to dispose of when you’re done.

It’s easy to dismiss pop fiction as trash for the masses. It’s also dangerous to dismiss pop fiction as trash for the masses. Why?

All books, even those which may be irritating/annoying/present a point we don’t agree with, have value.
The masses are aptly named–they’re the majority of readers, the folk who make bestsellers bestsellers.

Hello, my name is Peta, and I am a literary snob. I look my down my overly large Indian nose at many books, particularly when I’m in a funk over my own writing. I am irritated by clunky prose, drawn out of stories by dry dialogue, and find words like “ain’t” only a few ellipses short of repulsive. I pride myself on being able to craft a good sentence. I’ve also been known to spend hours crafting that one sentence.

Generally speaking, though, readers are not looking for a perfect sentence. They’re not looking to deconstruct a book, or get together and create a literary love file. Much as I–literary snob and book geek that I am–hate to admit it, the general reader is not looking for carefully polished prose. Most readers are looking for the Big Three:

Entertainment
Thought-provoking plot or characters
Familiar, straightforward writing

But straightforward writing, while not necessarily literary or writerly (writerly in a bad, overwrought sense) is a good thing, because it’s, well, straightforward, and easily understood by the lowest common denominator.

The Lowest Common Denominator

Finding the lowest common denominator is not just something you do in elementary math. (Though I do love fractions. Something about those little numbers and slashes makes me very happy. Recurring decimals? Blech.) But the lowest common denominator, in figurative terms, is similar to its mathematical counterpart: it’s a way of finding the broadest possible common ground, something that appeals to everyone, i.e. the masses. (I’m not using LCD in a derogatory sense–I’m a big fan of the masses, being one of them and all.)

Column writing provides a great example of appealing to the lowest common denominator. To write a successful column, it’s important to think about audience, and find the same wavelength as your audience. Craig Wilson, a columnist for USA Today, does this by using simple, clear language–most of his columns use common words with a maximum of two syllables. This isn’t because Wilson has a poor vocabulary, or because he thinks his readers have mashed prunes for brains. It’s because, for a popular columnist, getting the story across is more important than stringing together a few pretty words. (Fun fact: the word “prose” actually comes from a Latin word meaning “straightforward discourse”.)

In terms of fiction, writing for the lowest common denominator is not quite so simple, because there’s genre to consider. Hard science fiction readers have different interests, and a different threshold to historical romance readers. Each genre (even literary fiction) has its own language (I almost wrote “lexicon”, then remembered this is a post about straightforward writing). Historical romance readers may be familiar with terms like “farrier” and “roustabout” while science fiction readers are not. Shooting for just the historical romance reader may alienate potential readers skimming in a bookstore or taking a stroll through a friend’s shelves. Yet over-explaining, or using very simple language (“farrier” vs. “the man who makes horse shoes and takes care of hooves”), could frustrate experienced genre readers. So where is the line?

Putting Genre-Specific Language in Context

In a recent, very unscientific polling of my bookshelves, I discovered that my favorite authors are those who use context to explain or describe important details. Let’s say I’m writing a novel with a farrier named Percy. The first time I introduce Percy, I might write:

Farriers–horseshoe makers–were a welcome sort in every town, a fact Percy played to his advantage. Offering a three shoe for the price of two deal every Sunday, Tuesday, and Friday, he reminded his more intelligent customers that no, a better deal could not be got elsewhere, because there was, in fact, no other elsewhere, as Percy’s nearest competition was one hundred miles away, or eight hours by a regular horse, and twelve hours by a three-shod one, so they’d best take advantage of his deal and buy twelve shoes to save four hours.

Later, when I want to revisit Percy, but not go into such horse-shoeing detail, I could use sensory details to remind the reader of what a farrier is:

Athenia breathed deeply, savoring the farrier’s scent of sweat, fire, iron, and the forge mingled with the foppish apple tobacco he preferred.

The brief description of scents associated with Percy the farrier remind the reader that a farrier is, amongst other things, a type of metalworker. Added to other contextual clues, this is enough to ground the unfamiliar reader without irritating the seasoned one.

A Note on the Lowest Common Denominator in YA

Finding the lowest common denominator in a YA audience is a bit strange, because YA isn’t written along handy-dandy genre lines. And teens are less entrenched in a particular kind of reading, and are willing to jump around subject matter, so the general genre language rules don’t apply. Just be honest, write authentically, take a few deep breaths, and everything will be okay. Or at least as okay as it ever is. Of course, getting a handle on familiar style might also help…

On Thursday, I’ll have more about “writing poorly” and YA, in my very creatively titled post, Reading Fast, Writing Poorly, & Getting Old.

Looking for an example of straightforward, popular fiction? Check out this free download of Heat Wave, a Richard Castle novel, from ABC.com.

Do you write for everyone? Or do you stick to a specific audience? Why?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Writing YA: Reading Deeply to Write Deeply

Writing YA: Reading Deeply to Write DeeplyWe all do it, right? Glance at a group of letters, pull out a word. Reading is so ingrained in our minds that it’s almost impossible to not read signs, titles, anything with words on. But there’s reading, and then there’s reading.

Today, reading mostly falls into two categories: reading for pleasure, and reading for information. Reading as an art–really reading, reading deeper, to get within a story, to pick it to pieces and learn how it works–is fast becoming forgotten.

But What Does “Reading Deeper” Mean?

Reading deeper is about thinking deeper, about tapping into critical thinking skills. Instead of being carried away by surface currents, a deep reader asks questions. Unlike general reading for pleasure, though, deep reading requires active thought.

E.g.
Anne of Green Gables – Why does Anne Shirley want a more romantic name?
Little Women – Why does Jo care about cutting her hair off?
Wuthering Heights – Why does the weather mirror Catherine and Heathcliff’s moods?

Another way to think of reading deeper is to think of it as reading between the lines. In the first Anne book, Montgomery establishes that Anne thinks herself unworthy of love and affection. But instead of simply telling the reader this, Montgomery uses contrasts. At first glance, a reader might chalk Anne’s dislike of her too-ordinary nose and freckles up to vanity. But when taken in context alongside the girl’s history as an orphan and her want of a more romantic name, Anne’s inner thoughts are made clear.

But what I think of as deep reading goes beyond reading between the lines–it’s sometimes called analytical reading. In an article for CopyBlogger, founder Brian Clark writes:

At this level of reading, you’ve moved beyond superficial reading and mere information absorption. You’re now engaging your critical mind to dig down into the meaning and motivation beyond the text. To get a true understanding of a book, you would:

  • Identify and classify the subject matter as a whole
  • Divide it into main parts and outline those parts
  • Define the problem(s) the author is trying to solve
  • Understand the author’s terms and key words
  • Grasp the author’s important propositions
  • Know the author’s arguments
  • Determine whether the author solves the intended problems
  • Show where the author is uninformed, misinformed, illogical or incomplete

Reading for Facts or Fun

How is this different to reading for fun or information? When we’re reading for fun, we let our conscious minds drift, giving ourselves leave to be caught up in the story. If the action gets a bit intense and our favorite character’s in danger, we might skip ahead, looking for their name, or words that indicate everything’s okay in Trixie-land (I read a lot of Trixie Belden this way when I was a kid). Sometimes, we’ll go back to fill in the blanks. Other times, particularly if the book is something akin to a cozy mystery, we just keep reading and assume anything important will be covered later.

Reading for information also involves skimming, particularly if you’re a speed reader. Instead of taking in every word, we skim a page until we find relevant sections, then read more comprehensively–sometimes reading quite deeply, but only within a given section.

Of course, there are exceptions–as anyone studying literature, history, or even reading itself, like my crit partner and friend, Livia–will know. If you’re writing a paper on The Old Man and the Sea, you pretty much have to read deeply and pull the book to pieces because that’s where the information you’re using for the paper comes from, in contrast to, say, a biology paper on photosynthesis.

Unsurprisingly, deep reading and critical thinking are important skills for writers. But they’re especially important for YA writers.

Why We Need to Read Deeper, Especially in YA

It’s easy to dismiss YA and teen readers–we’re constantly reminded that teens have short attention spans, that there are half a dozen cute kittens and dancing hamsters just a couple of clicks away. To some extent, the YA bestseller list even supports the idea – Twilight, The Mortal Instruments series, even The Hunger Games are full of flash and bang. Why? Because it’s hard to be distracted when:

  • things are blowing up
  • a demon is chasing you
  • the hot guy you’ve been dreaming about is leaning in close for a first kiss

Some flash-bang books are definitely worth a deeper read–there are a lot of layers in The Hunger Games (Suzanne Collins) and The Mortal Instruments (Cassandra Clare) that are lost in that quick, exciting first read.But for every popular action-packed book, there are a dozen contemporary YA novels being devoured every day. Yes, some of them are edgy, issue books about abuse, rape, eating disorders and the like. But the majority are not. The majority are, on the surface, simple slice-of-life books about school, or summer jobs, or a pair of pants that magically fits four girls with drastically different weights and heights.

Why are teens reading these books? Because they’re relevant. On the surface, the stories may seem as ordinary as Anne Shirley’s nose. In truth, the authors are catching hold of the things most important to their readers on a subconscious level. (Good examples include Ann Brashares’ Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants series, Melina Marchetta’s Looking for Alibrandi and On the Jellicoe Road, Randa Abdel-Fattah’s Does My Head Look Big In This? and, to some extent, J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter, particularly The Prisoner of Azkaban and Goblet of Fire.)

Remember when I said deeper reading leads to deeper thinking? That’s just the first part of the chain – deeper thinking leads to deeper writing, too. Think about it–if you invest time figuring out why and how a book like When You Reach Me (Rebecca Stead) works, you suddenly have a whole lot of information about story construction at your fingertips (see Clark’s list above for ways to get started). And while you may not sit down and write out every detail you’ve gleaned (though taking notes is definitely useful), they’ll rattle around your brain and inform the next thing you sit down to write. And that information will help you write a deeper, more relevant story–the kind that catches hold of your reader’s mind, then doesn’t let go until it’s done.

Which slice-of-life YA novels have caught hold of you? Why? Do you read deeply?

P.S the kidlet has been trying to add to this post all day. Here’s what he has to say.

——-zzzzzzz—kjk

Image Credit: lusi, via sxc.hu

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page