twitter Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest Email RSS

Wednesday Book News: 7 Links For Your Morning Coffee Break (4/6/11)

Mir holding a colored Easter egg out to the camera

Mir gets ready for Easter

Good morning, book people! It’s sunny & kinda-sorta warm in Cambridge this morning – I actually ran outside! And now I’m home, with my boys, coffee, warm beignets, and a pretty fun day ahead, showing my cousin around town. What more could a girl ask for? Oh, wait…Easter eggs! Fortunately, the Mir-Cat has a few to offer around…

Yesterday, ex-Agent (wow, that makes him sound like a Bond villain) Nathan Bransford posted about virtual witch hunts and respect within the writing community. A must-read.

Agent Kristin Nelson has a short video (1:58 minutes) with a couple of useful query tips. She also has The Book Lantern, an in-depth look at the supporting characters in a story. It’s broken down into “Parents,” “Mean Girl,” and “The Friends,” and is very, very useful. Works as a great checklist for avoiding stereotypes.

SLJ’s A Chair, A Fireplace, & A Tea Cozy has a very well done review of Melina Marchetta’s The Piper’s Son. Marchetta is an Australian author; her first book, Looking for Alibrandi, is on a lot of reading lists back home. SLJ’s review is very positive–which I mostly agree with–though I don’t think Marchetta’s “teen/twenties guy” voice is as strong as her “teen/twenties girl.”

Check out The Big Kahuna Round of SLJ’s Battle of the Kids Books. So far, I’ve only read A Conspiracy of Kings–which I loved–but all these books look good.

In case you missed it, The NYT has a list of the best children’s book apps on the iPad. And here’s a guest post at Scholastic’s On Our Minds, musing on the future of such apps.

And finally, another must read–Library Journal’s Annoyed Librarian on the Devolution of Public Libraries, and privatization. It’s a little old in internet time, but an essential post.

And that’s it, folks. I’ll try and take some more pics of Borders while I’m in town, so we can see how the remaining stores are holding up. Have a great day!

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Playing With The iPad Comes Easily To A 10 Month Old

Dora's Coloring Adventures, by NickolodeonOver the weekend, I had a chance to play with an iPad in the Apple store. The selection of apps available was limited, though I did spend some time reading (tiring on the eyes) and typing (surprisingly easy, though I spent a lot of time watching my fingers). One kids’ book app had a demo: Dora the Explorer Coloring Adventures (pictured left). From the iPad app store:

“It’s time to explore and color in “Dora the Explorer Coloring Adventures!”. Kids can go on adventures in creativity with a combination scene creation and coloring book designed specifically for the iPad.”

The app’s use is fairly intuitive–tap Dora to bring her to the fore, tap colors to select, finger slide Dora around to place her in the scene. Unlike real coloring, everything produced is perfect: kids can’t color outside the lines, and even the most garish hue selections are glossy and pretty, eerily coordinated on the iPad’s shiny new screen. Although fun for a moment or two, I found the app a little soul-destroying–the neat lines and finger taps strip away creativity at the deepest level.

Of course, a child interested in Dora the Explorer may be too young to care about the difference between playing with real finger paints and tapping away with Jobs’ virtual ones. Several children at the store were engrossed in reading books (pausing to shout “look, mom, I’m reading on an iPad and I like it!), coloring, and playing with piano software. Curious, my husband lifted helped him reach an iPad.

Baby, unsurprisingly, wasn’t up to the Dora app. But at 10 months old, he was able to make the iPad go in much the same way he makes his musical cube and piano table go–by tapping and flailing and squealing with joy. Using Magic Piano by Smule, a virtual piano app with a no-fail option, he played one of his favorite songs, Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star, and was able to recognize the melody (no doubt thanks to our regular attendance at Jeff Jam singalongs at Twinkle Star in Cambridge). Unforunately, we didn’t capture the piano playing, as he was playing with me.

Already, Baby is one of the new Apple generation of kids, comfortable with technology and touch screens in a way I’ll never be. Is this a good thing? I’m not sure. Crazy-new-parent Peta screams no, though more rational anti-luddite Peta reasons yes. Historically, familiarity with technology has led to better education, better language acquisition, and better job placement (ah, Ned, you were just a stone’s throw away from a book deal and a COO position at Armani!). That said, television was once a new technology, and the so-called idiot box can have effects on child development, particularly language acquisition, if allowed in excess.

The key? Moderation. Some studies have shown that educational television a la Sesame Street, in moderation, can be helpful. Joe and I have strict-ish limits on television, just in case–Baby watches a Baby Signing Time DVD for, at most 15 minutes twice a week (usually just once a week). Occasionally, he sees some incidental television, but we’re pretty quick to distract him. That said, the Baby Signing Time DVDs are having a positive effect–the kidlet can now sign for more, milk, all done, drink, eat, and dog. Milk, eat, and more are particularly useful, and are eliminating a lot of frustration in our household.

Dora the Explorer Coloring Adventures isn’t Baby Signing Time, and, if we had an iPad in our house, I’d probably skip it. But limited access to educational apps and encouraging Baby to be comfortable with technology may be prove to be more useful than I’d previously reckoned. We’re still a long way away from getting a household iPad, though.

Do you let your kids watch tv? Would you let them use an iPad, or other gadget (assuming the cost weren’t prohibitive)?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Reading Kidlit: Kids’ Books & the Kindle

Amazon's KindleIn the era of the iPad, Amazon’s Kindle appears clunky and drab. The thumb tap keyboard is passe, the gray screen drab, and the lack of touchscreen so 2006. Yet, in some ways, the Kindle one-ups the iPad–lacking interactivity, the Kindle forces users to focus only on the text, provides a quick and easy way (via the OED and Wikipedia) to check a word meaning or make sense of a reference, offers a text to speech function, and has a battery life of around a week with wi-fi turned off. But while the Kindle will remain useful to adults–particularly adults uncomfortable with technology and touch screens–it’s likely the iPad will go where no e-reader has gone before and completely corner the kids’ market.

I know, I know, the Kindle isn’t the only e-reader out there. But B&N’s nook, Sony’s e-reader, and Spring Design’s Alex offer roughly the same set of features as the Kindle, give or take minor changes (the nook’s virtual keyboard, for instance). None of them offer the interactivity of an iPad, and none feature a color screen for text or illustration. And so far, Amazon offers the most access to kids’ e-books, with a quick search returning in excess of 27, 000 results.

iPad vs. Kindle

Should the iPad be allowed to corner the kids’ market? There are pros and cons, and in most cases, I’m all for e-books within reason. But in the case of kid lit–picture books, early readers, even middle grade novels, the iPad may be overkill.

Kid lit isn’t immune to the tech boom–Leap Frog, Fisher Price, and others have been marketing read-to-me versions of books for years. Almost all the toddlers I know have their own educational, brightly-styled laptops. Why? Because in kid-land, bright is a good thing–unless we’re talking e-readers.

The iPad, despite its app-books and pretty pictures, is a computer. It’s main function is consumerist, not educational–which is okay if you’re over, say, the age of 13/14/15/25 (and, as MacWorld points out, will not replace a Kindle in terms of comfort, anyway). Of course, this hasn’t stopped publishers from releasing kid-targeted book-apps and marketing to the under 5 set. The Kindle, in contrast, is all about the book–it’s a reading device with a little extra functionality, to make reading easier. But Kindle kids’ books have, for the most part, slipped through the cracks–despite the Kindle probably being the better device for reading to your kids.

Types of Kids’ Books on the Kindle

So far, Amazon’s offerings include pretty much every kind of kids’ book available. Classics such as Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and Stevenson’s Treasure Island show up on the first page, alongside Twilight (Stephanie Meyer) and Rick Riordan’s Percy Jackson series. Well-known picture books, such as The Potty Book (Alyssa Satin Capucilli and Dorothy Stott), Head, Shoulders, Knees, and Toes (Annie Kubler), and even H.A. Rey’s Curious George series are also available, despite the e-reader’s matte gray screen.

Wondering just what illustrations look like on the Kindle? Check back tomorrow to see the cover from Billy Goats Gruff.

Reading to Your Child on a Kindle

Can you read to a child on the Kindle? Yes–if you’re reading a primarily text book. Picture books show illustrations on one page, then text separately, if the publisher even includes pictures in the e-version. If I had a gazillion dollars, I’d buy an iPad. And a monkey, because I’ve always wanted a monkey. And a fur coat, but not a real fur coat, that’s cruel. But if I had to choose between the iPad and the Kindle as a reading device for my child–and solely a reading device–I’d pick the Kindle (or the nook, B&N, if you’d like to give me one). Why? The Kindle may be far from perfect, but it’s the more bookish reader. The lack of bells and whistles makes it easier for small, easily distracted minions to focus, the page buttons are easy to use, and it’s lightweight, much like an oversize board book.

Yet where the iPad is distracting in its detail, the Kindle is almost completely lacking in sensory details–the feel of pages against fingertips, the clean, ink scent of a book–reading on a Kindle is an almost sterile experience. For teens and adults, this can be a good thing, as it helps take a reader deeper inside a book. But for a child still learning about books and reading, and developing their senses, such a lack is a terrible thing.

Reading with your little one is a large part of fostering a love of reading. Curling up together in a comfy chair, reading before bedtime, peeking beneath flaps and scratching and sniffing small plastic dots together are all part of the bonding experience. If we strip away the social aspect–the bonding aspect–of reading together, it’s possible kids simply won’t learn to love books, and that video games and television will become the order of the day.

Will my kidlet ever have an e-reader? Probably–as he grows older and the technology becomes cheaper, an e-reader like Amazon’s DX could be useful for textbooks (and prevent the textbook stoop I suffered from as school-loving nerdlet) and school reading assignments. Right now, though, neither a Kindle nor an iPad are on the books–because Mir’s too busy reading real ones.

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

No More Book Signings? (at Popmatters.com)

Book tours and author visits are a large part of publishing’s promotional band wagon. With author visits new titles get a top spot in stores and fans get to see their favorite writers up close and personal. More popular than simple author appearances, though, are book signings. They offer a chance to chat, but also to own a personalized piece of a given author’s work. Yet, despite their popularity, book signings may soon be going the way of the dodo.

Read more @ PopMatters…

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Reading Kidlit: Kids’ Books on the iPad

April 3rd heralded a good weekend for books–or a bad weekend, depending on your perspective. According to this article in PW, over the April 3rd weekend, in excess of 250,000 books were “sold” (current numbers include a lot of freebies and public domain downloads)–on the iPad. But the e-lit frenzy doesn’t stop there: of the more than one million apps downloaded over the launch weekend, many of which were book-apps. Given the furor raised by the reading and publishing potential of the iPad, it’s not surprising that books and app-books did so well. The real surprise? The number of children’s titles that made the top spots.

Six out of the top ten paid book-apps were kids’ books, and not all of them were cheap. The Miss Spider’s Tea Party app, based on a popular counting picture book about a spider who wants to throw a tea party but is feared by everyone because she’s a spider, is a virtual coloring book, letting kids fingerpaint their own versions of the illustrations. Other apps, like OceanHouse Media’s Dr. Seuss titles, are more educational, highlighting text as a narrator reads aloud; when a picture is touched, the associated word appears, helping younger readers put two and two together. Here’s the breakdown, via PW.

Top children’s book-apps:

  • Toy Story 2 Read-Along, Disney Books
  • How to Train Your Dragon
  • Miss Spider’s Tea Party
  • The Goose That Laid the Golden Egg

Children’s and YA titles that made the top 10 free downloads in the iBookstore:

  • Toy Story Read-Along
  • Twilight, the Graphic Novel (Lite), Vol 1
  • ABC Dinosaurs–iPad edition

Top 5 Paid kidlit and YA titles:

  1. Eclipse, Stephanie Meyers (second in the Twilight series)
  2. The Lightning Thief, Rick Riordan
  3. Twilight, Stephanie Meyers
  4. Breaking Dawn, Stephanie Meyers (third in the Twilight series)
  5. The Berenstain Bears Go To Sunday School, Michael Berenstain, Stan Berenstain, & Jan Berenstain

Will the iPad Encourage Reading, or Hinder It?

Anyone who’s ever walked around a Toys ‘R’ Us knows that Disney knows about merch. There’s a Disney available for every age group, from infant crinkle books to Hannah Montana branded guitars. And Disney has a large, loyal parent following–a large, loyal following the company clearly intends to suck into iPad world.

On launch day, Disney started out with just one book-app, the Toy-Story 2 Read Along. But there are plans in the works to release at least another 4 book-apps over the next two months. According to Jeanne Mosure, senior v-p and group publisher of Disney Publishing Worldwide, these book-apps actually make “children more excited about the prospect of reading more and buying more books.”

Educational book tie-ins also promise to be big business–3 of the 6 top kids book-apps are educational-related titles (If Twilight had educational titles available, it may have been all 6). And Oceanhouse Media, producer of the two Dr. Seuss book-apps, is focused on using its products for good. According to Michel Kripalani, Oceanhouse’s president, “Ted Geisel was all about teaching kids how to read. Every feature we put into this book has to support reading and teaching kids how to read.”

Reading in Solitude

So far, it appears that most of the early reader books-apps are similar to the educational reading toys many parents already provide for their kids, a more interactive form of the Leapfrog/Fisher Price &c. read to me kind, a market Disney is already tapped into. And education is good, right? Well, right. Except that while books-apps may encourage early readers, they may also make reading a more solitary activity.

Isn’t reading already a solitary activity? For older children and adults, yes. But babies, toddlers, and early readers can’t get inside a book on their own, and require someone else to read to or with them. Creating a family connection through books is part of fostering a love of reading and, while some toys may make a parent/sibling/grandparent less necessary to the process, few (Leapfrog’s tag reading system comes to mind) replace them altogether, because younger children need help with the physicality of reading–opening the book, holding the book, turning the pages, recognizing where the story ends on one page and begins on the next.

The iPad takes away the necessity of an older adult–as this video making the rounds of the interwebs shows, using the iPad is intuitive, even to children as small as two and an half. And the idea that reading and book-apps are educational might lead some parents to sit their kids in front of the iPad as babysitter, because the educational sheen of its apps makes it seem like a lesser evil than the idiot box.  (And it may be–is iPad interactivity better than television’s zero interactivity? I don’t know.)

Bringing More Books Home?

Over the past few years, libraries all over the US have been closing their doors due to lack of funding and resources. And buying books can get expensive–especially buying children’s books. Services such as the International Children’s Digital Library, a non-profit and “library for the world’s children,” help fill the gap, providing free texts and activities for young readers. From the ICDL mission statement:

The mission of the International Children’s Digital Library Foundation (ICDL Foundation) is to support the world’s children in becoming effective members of the global community – who exhibit tolerance and respect for diverse cultures, languages and ideas — by making the best in children’s literature available online free of charge. The Foundation pursues its vision by building a digital library of outstanding children’s books from around the world and supporting communities of children and adults in exploring and using this literature through innovative technology designed in close partnership with children for children.

The ICDL now offers a free iPad app, created in conjunction with the University of Maryland, in an effort to help kids get even more out of their library. Allison Druin, director of the Human-Computer Interaction Lab at the University of Maryland, points out that “The way children read books is sitting on their bed, sitting with their parents. Laptops are good, but an iPad is going to be even more freeing. The more that our technologies afford the feeling of what was once only able to be given to us through paper, the more we don’t notice what the technology is, and we just care about the content.”

It’s possible that for every ICDL book downloaded on the iPad, three book-apps with half a dozen bells and whistles will also be downloaded. And a lot of the kids without access to bricks and mortars libraries fall into the tech gap, with family incomes that don’t allow for whizz-bang consumer tech. But where Apple leads, others tend follow–the iPad is more of a prototype than anything else, and less expensive consumer-oriented tablets, also with free library apps and software, will probably appear within the next few years. By then, every kid will have to buy one, because the way library closings are going just now, there won’t be any brick and mortar options left.

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Penguin & the iPad: Taking Books to the Next Level, or Leaving Them in the Dust?

Apple’s latest gadget, the iPad, hits shelves this weekend. There’s been a lot of chatter on the interwebs and in the publishing world about how the shiny new tech may change the way we think of books. Earlier this year, Penguin CEO John Makinson debuted a concept video demonstrating some of the ways the house is planning on tapping the potential of Apple’s new iPad. With interfaces less like a book and more like an iPhone app, it’s clear the company is taking this new platform seriously.

Read more…

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Penguin & the iPad: Taking Books to the Next Level, or Leaving Them in the Dust?

Earlier this week, Penguin CEO John Makinson debuted a concept video demonstrating some of the ways the house is planning on tapping the potential of Apple’s new iPad. With interfaces less like a book and more like an iPhone app, it’s clear the company is taking this new platform seriously.

John Makinson, from PaidContentUK:

We will be embedding audio, video and streaming in to everything we do. The .epub format, which is the standard for ebooks at the present, is designed to support traditional narrative text, but not this cool stuff that we’re now talking about.

So for the time being at least we’ll be creating a lot of our content as applications, for sale on app stores and HTML, rather than in ebooks. The definition of the book itself is up for grabs. We don’t know whether a video introduction will be valuable to a consumer. We will only find answers to these questions by trial and error.

Directly Targeting Younger Readers

Several of Penguin’s innovations directly target younger readers–an e-version of Eric Hill’s Spot series takes lift-the-flap books to the next level. Soon, kids will be able to customize Spot’s look, help him tidy his room, and, of course, follow along with Spot’s mom as she looks in trunks, closets, and under the bed to find the mischievous little puppy. Page turns are easy, too–a simple finger swipe–making the books accessible to even the youngest readers.

Compared to the Kindle experience–text on one screen, grainy monochrome illustrations on the next–choosing the iPad as a kid-friendly reader is a no-brainer. But the $500 price tag is a lot for Baby’s First E-reader (unless you’re one of the glitterati, in which case the iPad probably costs less than Baby’s First Blanket). Fortunately, Penguin’s app-like offerings include interactive YA titles (Richelle’s Mead’s Vampire Academy features an in-text chat option), DK textbooks (with zoom, 3D view, and video), and DK travel guides (the screen switches to map view when placed on a table, then back to book view when help). DK’s Starfinder, once a go-to for learning to navigate the night sky, will navigate for users–use the compass function to help the iPad get its bearings, then point it at a section of sky and voila! detailed information about visible constellations appears onscreen.

As I’ve pointed out before, the iPad is a great halfway tool, offering teens the functionality of a laptop (and possibly more) for a fraction of the price. But will Penguin’s app model make books more accessible to kids and teens, or less?

Changing the Way Kids Read? Or Changing the Nature of a Book?

As any pediatrician will tell you, reading is a vital part of a child’s development. Reading helps form important neural connections, helps with language development and cognitive skills, and generally improves a child’s life. But the studies that support this revolve around a paper and ink model. If Penguin style app-books take off, some children could soon think Spot has always lived in Mummy’s iPad. But does this matter?

I’m not sure. I’ve always loved books–I’ve spent countless hours curled up among library shelves reading, enjoying the scent and press of musty old pages around me. My baby also loves reading–several times a day, he catches my eye, picks up a book (and yes, we have Spot books), holds it out, and waits. When I finish a page, he turns to the next one. When I finish a book, he reaches for another. Would he love books less is he swiped a finger across a screen instead of turning a page?

The iPad and Penguin’s new concept models still use the standard words on a page–they just include some interactivity. Chatting about a book while reading it is not a novel idea–school kids do it all the time (when I was in year 9, the rest of the class hated War of the Worlds so much the teacher had us each read a chapter and fill each other in). Being able to chat within a book is, as far as I can see, akin to reading cliff notes, encouraging teens to dig deeper into a text, and think about whys and hows of the story in much the same way as a good book review. This sort of functionality could even be adapted to school work, with teens reading, say, Macbeth, discussing it with their project group as they read, or leaving notes for one another on a shared meta-copy/open wiki.

Not all kids like to read–some find books boring, some are dyslexic, some just haven’t found the right book. The interactivity Penguins app-books offer (particularly the chat feature) may be the boost some teens need–where they once hung out on IM swapping thoughts about the day, they could soon hang out within a book, Jasper Fforde style. And Penguin’s app-books may be just the first of many. According to Makinson, Apple’s 30% take on app-revenue “is better than the equivalent print agency model, in which publishers let retailers keep 50 percent“.

The Essence of a Book

What makes a book a book? Much like the printing press, romances, and early novels, the iPad is forcing readers to think about what a book actually is. Although the Kindle, the Nook, and other e-readers have had their share of “you’re destroying my beloved books” rage, they’ve remained true to standard book format: words inked on a page. This is the way humans have read for thousands of years–Plato read words inked on a page the same way Baby reads words inked on a page.

But books are really just a delivery system, aren’t they? Before books, we still had information. Before books, we still had stories. Homer told stories from memory, using verbal cues to remind him of the next section, much as the original tellers of Beowulf probably did. Books simply gave us an easier way to remember what comes next, and a more efficient way to share it around. Once upon a time, if the guy who knew how to keep the wheat field alive died without passing on his knowledge died, the rest of the village would starve. Nowadays, you need to grow wheat, you run down to the library, hop on the internet, or call up your Ag. Sci best friend Jack.

When it comes down to it, I love the print reading experience, but it’s not why I read. Books are about information–getting it, sharing it, thinking about it. Although they’re a necessary tool, we’ve moved beyond books as a means to survival. And while we take books for pleasure for granted, it wasn’t an easy transition–fiction and the novel were looked down upon by the wealthy and the intelligentsia as recently as the 20th century.

The thing books–e-books, print books, any books–really do, though, is help us create experiences within our own minds. Watching a movie shows us someone else’s experience. Words help us create our own–my version of Katniss Everdeen will be different to my friend Amitha’s version, and her version will be different to Suzanne Collins’ version. They may all have the same colored hair, the same colored eyes, the same height, but they’ll still look different, sound different. Books–words–tie into our experiences, our memories, to paint a picture all our own. How the words are delivered doesn’t matter.

There’s a reason the Folio Society does old classics instead of new ones–kids and teens are interested in the story, not the cover. Sure, covers sell, but, just like we tell our kids, it’s what’s inside that counts. While the latest Vampire Academy book may not help teens learn how to catch rabbits the next time I’m lost in the woods or dropped into an arena to fight twenty-three of my peers to the death, it will give them things to think about. And while thinking about vampires may seem a waste of time, remember, the blood-suckers are people too–they think, they reason, they’re self-aware, and they face, at their core, many of the same issues as teens today. Whether they’re reading a print copy, an e-copy, or an app-book, teens will still get to the same place: a world in their heads. Would it be so terrible if the iPad let them share it?

Would you read an app-book? Do you ever chat while reading? Or are you a die-hard print only reader?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page

Apple vs. Amazon, the War on e-Book Pricing and the YA Market

ipadE-books have been around for some time–Michael S. Hart began the Gutenberg Project in 1971 (to put this in perspective, e-books were available eight years before the Pink Floyd classic, Another Brick in the Wall). Selling e-books and e-content, however, is relatively new. The first pay-model e-book sites appeared around 1999. At the same time, science fiction and fantasy publisher Baen opened up the Baen Free Library. Major publishers didn’t hop on the e-wagon until 2002, when Random House and HarperCollins began marketing e-versions of select titles.

Today, there’s a still perception that e-content should be cheap or free. Torrent sites persist, newspaper subscriptions (online and print) are on the decline, and few pay content models are actually making money. Online booksellers Amazon and, later, Barnes & Noble, are perpetuating this view with their $9.99 price cap on e-titles.

Should e-books be cheaper than their print counterparts? For the most part, yes. In the case of most titles, production is cheaper–there is no paper, no cover art, no dust jacket or printing costs. Older titles may require editing–a recent read of an Obernewtyn series title (Isobelle Carmody) appeared to be an early galley, full of typos and other copy problems. Figure-heavy texts may also be more difficult to render well, resulting in higher, specialty production costs.

Apple, however, seems set to challenge the status quo with the iPad (see how I neatly avoided writing “game-changer”? It can be done, people!). Publishers Weekly, the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times are reporting hardcover sale prices of $12.99 – $14.99. Houses and their authors actually stand to earn less from the increased price point after Apple’s 30% take.

It’s possible the increased price is a reflection of a jump in production costs. Apple’s latest doohickey has color rendering potential and displays covers on a neat little virtual bookshelf. While Amazon currently subsidizes houses to support their $9.99 sales, there’s been some speculation that the capped pricing may encourage the idea that all books are worth less. (Interestingly, many physical paperbacks cost less than Kindle titles–a quick survey of my shelves reveals an average paperback price range of $4.99 – $7.99.)

Will the increased prices affect sales? The iPad uses neither e-ink nor e-paper, making it an only slightly more comfortable option than reading off a monitor. The popularity of the Kindle alone–Amazon reports sales of 6 Kindle books for every 10 physical books over the past year–suggests  long-term on-screen reading is far from popular. But publishers may also appreciate the opportunity to set their own prices. Publishers may also appreciate the opportunity to set their own prices – Macmillan recently changed the terms of their agreement with Amazon (though Amazon has yet to restore Macmillan titles to their store), raising prices to iPad levels. Chatter around the interwebs suggests others houses may soon follow suit.

Although the iPad may not wrest control of the e-book market any time soon, it will likely gain a fair chunk of the YA e-book market. Tech Crunchies, an internet statistics site, suggests the majority of e-reader users are 35-54 years old with an average household income of $100, 000. This isn’t surprising–e-readers are very expensive for a single function piece of technology ($259 for both Kindle and the Nook). Comparatively, a wifi only iPad will be $499–just under twice the price for at least four times the functionality. And, while it’s lower-powered than the traditional laptop, the iPad may prove popular with families who can’t afford a laptop for their teens (it runs iWork, has an almost fully-sized on-screen keyboard, and can bluetooth with a secondary keyboard). The iPad’s portability also makes it ideal for school use. (Technology companies have long marketed to children and teens, with 1 in 5 kids having a cell phone by the time they turn 8.) Many new adults, or twenty-somethings, also buy from the YA pool – twenty-somethings who are also influenced by the status of hi-tech gadgets and have money of their own with which to buy them – meaning the number of YA readers buying books on the iPad may actually be quite high.

What about the iPad’s lack of e-paper and e-ink? YA readers have grown up with much more screen time than the Kindle and Nook’s primary demographic; it’s possible reading on the iPad for long periods will be quite comfortable for readers in their and early twenties.

Is this enough to change how YA readers buy books? It could be, especially if publishers play their cards right. Remember the long lines at bookstores the day Harry Potter and Twilight books hit the shelves? E-readers offer instant gratification–imagine getting the latest hot title at 12:01 the day it’s released. Fanboys and girls everywhere would be willing to pay a premium for the extra 8 hours and 59 minutes reading time. (Of course, this won’t work for all titles–J.K. Rowling has been clear that her books will never be available as e-titles.) And then there’s the potential for new media tie-ins–the iPad offers houses a chance to add optional extras such as author commentary, interviews, even revision drafts for very little effort. Clever houses (Tor and Baen come to mind) could experiment with communities–readers could add their own footnotes, or have discussions in the electronic margins of a text.

The iPad may not replace the Kindle or Nook, but it is poised to change the way we read. With added features and functionality, it could steal the YA market–and keep prices in the $12.99 – $14.99 range if not driving them higher.

What do you think? Would you buy your teen an iPad in lieu of a laptop? Would you use a discussion app, or read/watch author commentary? Would you like to see the galleys of your favorite books?

Like this post? Share it! Or Subscribe via Email or RSS.


tweet this share on facebook share on google+ share on linkedin tumble this email this post print this page